Aurangzeb Aalamgeer was the the last Musghal emperor who ruled on the complete territory of "Indian Kingdom" but he spent all his life fighting against so many different insurgencies till he died in 1707. After his death one kingdom was split into different autonomous territories.
Pervez Musharaf also spent his whole ruling period to fight against the very own citizens of "Occupied Pakistan" in different regions like Dera Bugti, North Waziristan, South Waziristan and now in Swat and who knows whats next on his list !
But there is a significant difference in the situation of General Musharaf and the Aurangzeb: in the time of Aurangzeb all the insurgencies were motivated by "Hindu and Marhata" peoples against a "Muslim" Ruler. Those motions were also the reaction of weakness of the Mughal emperors due to their "inhouse fight for the rule". Where as Musharaf himself brought war on his own citizens, first he pushed them against America by showing pointless obedience to his foreigner Masters and then he started to impose restrictions on them against the promises that were made by Pakistani Govt at the time of their inclusion in Pakistan. We know that this pointless war has no end then why ? Do you want to conquer them for America ?
If you want peace in these areas then bring justice and stop ruling on them like a colony.
1 comment:
I have read your compression on General Parvez Musahraf and Mughal Emperor Aurangzeb. There are no similarities in between them. Mughal Emperor Aurangzeb was a great man although General Parvez Musahraf is a coward man.
Outsourcing Solution in Call Center
James White
Post a Comment